On the second amendment, it “may” be bilingual, I can't imagine anyone disagreeing with that. I mean, if the judge wants to have it bilingual, he will.
As for the third one, on the other processes, I guess the biggest push-back on this one...because you're talking about a significant amount of what appears to be, obviously, just modification to the system, it appears quite fair and reasonable and logical. But I guess the push-back from the provinces would be that this is all in negotiation with the provinces and territories that only have so much capacity, and you can only make so much progress at a time.
Do you think that such a large but justified logical amendment might sort of cause chaos in that type of gradual progression, getting the provinces and territories onside and getting the capacity to do this?