Okay, I'll leave the New Brunswick one to Mr. Ménard. I have one more question, though, if I have time.
Something you didn't bring up but I think you're interested in is the fact that if the accused has the judge or jury who can speak his language, it doesn't necessarily mean that they will. A lot of people say they're bilingual--perhaps they passed the test years ago--but then they go on in the wrong language. Do you have any amendment to propose that would ensure that, as much as possible, the accused gets the language of his right, that even if the person claims to be bilingual, they actually work in the language of the accused?