Not at all, I'm moving an amendment, a stand-alone.
Sure, I'll just give notice of my intention to move that amendment and we'll continue debate on Madam Jennings' amendment, but I'll finish my remarks.
I know Ms. Jennings' amendment is intended to narrow the focus of this specifically so it incorporates the principles of the Official Languages Act, and I can't believe anybody around this table would not agree with that objective.
One of the categories of appointments that do not fall within the scope of the official language objective is judicial appointments, and they're made on another basis equally consistent with the charter and our Constitution, but they don't fall within the ambit of these types of appointments. So I support the amendment and I'll move my other amendment later.
Thank you.