We did discuss production upon request with all of the authorities. I'm not able to state that everyone cherished the thought, but I believe that I would be right in stating that the jurisdictions accepted our argument, that is to say that there is already a recognition of this obligation in case law, under existing provisions, and that what the bill was seeking in its original version was only confirmation, for the purposes of clarity, of what was already recognized by the courts as being the law.
On May 15th, 2007. See this statement in context.