Okay, we'll give you some time later in one of our questions.
My first question is related to not a specific act...there's not enough specification on what they're investigating. There are two things. First, obviously, because they have to report annually and the reports are public, if they were doing something that was frivolous or unintended, wasn't a serious crime, then that would become obvious to everyone reading the reports and I don't think the police or anyone would want to be open to that type of transparency and criticism for not investigating something serious.
Secondly, does the nature of the crime they charge the person with really matter, especially if they were most likely to be after serious criminals? For instance, was Al Capone not eventually charged with income tax fraud, as opposed to something serious that might have been specified, in specifying an investigation that you are talking about now? I think people were very happy that Al Capone was put in jail.