When we do these prosecutions, we're assisted by the modern war crimes unit of the Department of Justice. This is also true of what I'll call regulatory offences. For example, Fisheries and Oceans has a unit at Justice, with lawyers experienced in that area. Perhaps Fisheries and Oceans is a bad example, because our prosecutors tend to be experienced in that area, but in the war crimes, we work with the modern war crimes unit lawyers. They provide advice. They don't have any influence on our prosecutorial decision, because that's where we draw the line and that's our independence. We can't have anyone influence that decision, but they help to provide the expertise.
When you get down to it, prosecutors are used to looking at a law, a provision of the Criminal Code, a provision of another statute, and determining the essential elements to prove. That's not too difficult to do. What becomes difficult is marshalling the evidence, and we hope our prosecutors are experts at that. That's what you become an expert at doing when you're a litigator: determining what evidence you have to call to meet the elements of the offence.