I have a question, but I don't expect an answer. It's something that will come up later.
We're replacing most of section 254 of the code. In the proposed section, we add in the matter of the presence of a drug in the body of the suspect. The belief that there has been the consumption of a drug within the previous three hours allows the policeman to require a test and allows the police officer to require the person to accompany the police officer for the purpose of taking those tests. And throughout all of that there is no requirement, as I read it, that there is a reasonable belief that there has been impairment, only that there is a drug in the body of that person.
So I'm leaving that issue there, as to whether we really want to have that. I assume we would want to have reasonable belief of impairment before we require the subject to do tests and accompany the police officer, which might be to a police detachment a half-hour away somewhere.