I am not sure I understand. First of all, I think you should declare the amendment inadmissible. Should you be tempted to rule otherwise, we will not support it. It is not clear to me.
You are saying that there could be two concurrent parole eligibility regimes. We want assurances that a young person is subject to the provisions of the Young Offenders Act, or is subject to the justice system as amended by Ms. Anne McLellan, namely the youth criminal justice system. So, if we adopt this amendment, the young offender would be eligible for parole sooner.
Did I understand you correctly?