Excuse me, we actually don't need an answer at this time. The issue is admissibility or inadmissibility.
The chair is going to rule that it's inadmissible. It's outside the scope of the bill. If we're going to change the Prisons and Reformatories Act and other things, we'll have to find another way to do it. So I'm going to rule that if there is no reaction from members to having that ruled inadmissible, then clause 45.2, which is the amendment, fails.
(Clause 46 agreed to)