But the question of impairment isn't contemplated in the study at all. It's a question about whether the test was able to tell whether or not the drug was in the system. The question of impairment is a wholly different question from the question of whether or not you have the presence of drugs or drug metabolites in your system. That's really one of the biggest problems with the bill. The bill seeks to determine the presence of drugs in the system. The impairment piece comes well before that.
There's a question of why on earth we are putting people through this invasive procedure when it is in fact not indicative of the question, which is whether or not the person is impaired.