That was a good question.
The first focus would be primarily on the Department of Justice, because that's where the bills come from. I mean, everyone on the committee has the same intentions, I think, which is to reduce crime, but some of the witnesses who have come forward have said they haven't been consulted in the normal process of developing legislation. Some of the bills, a lot of witnesses have said, have come contrary to achieving the objectives that all the members of the committee want to achieve, which is reducing crime. So how did that occur and how is the legislative process that developed these bills different from how it might have been in the past, as some witnesses suggested?
My concern wasn't with having legislative committees and cabinet and all that; it was more on the process used by the Department of Justice and the government to develop these bills.