The police officer's acuity at mastery and the efficacy of the neurological tests—as they say in medicine—all that means that detecting these indicators is really centred on the human character of the assessment of the test. That's what troubles me. I'm not questioning the police officers' competence. This morning we heard testimony to the effect that a number of lawyers were capable of being very procedural in a former life, still at $250 an hour, corporate rate, Mr. Petit.
That said, I'm not questioning the police officers' competence, but this disturbs me to the extent that we are taking a defence away from citizens. We are relying to a great extent on the fallible or human character of the first test, but not for the second, I understand. That's what troubles me.