Mr. Yost, there are two parts to the amendment you are proposing, unlike what we saw previously. It clearly states:
(2) If a peace officer has reasonable grounds to suspect that a person has alcohol or a drug in their body and that the person has, within the preceding three hours, operated a motor vehicle or vessel—
You would be imposing an additional burden on police officers. The individual will have to meet two conditions: that he drank alcohol and drove during the previous three hours. Did the previous version not make life easier for police officers? You seem to be complicating their lives. You are being harsher. Your amendment will make things easier for the defence.