Before you call the whole clause, I have one question—and I know we are trying to get this done fairly expeditiously.
Subclause 6(6) purports to remove what is called the two-beer defence. I just have one question. Will the removal of this subject of a defence impair the ability of an individual to defend his or her charge if they have been framed in some way? I realize that the two-beer defence is aimed only at the two-beer scenario, but let's say a citizen has been framed, either with respect to their identity or with respect to somebody slipping alcohol—vodka, or something—into something they have consumed, with the advertent purpose of framing the individual, with or without the police being co-opted? I do not know; it's only a hypothetical case I'm offering. Will this provision impair the ability of that citizen to defend himself or herself properly? Will it impair their ability to mount a full and fair defence?