Yes. It adds time. It adds to the possibility that they were driving without any substance in their body. Why would you run them through a test for that? You can do the test right now if you think they have alcohol in their body and they were driving. Why would you do an amendment that allows you to put people who are driving through a test but who don't have any substance in their body? That's all you're adding. The way it's written, you can already test them if they have a substance in their body.
On June 19th, 2007. See this statement in context.