I haven't thought this through. I'm in favour of the proposal, but I wouldn't want the wording we select now to obstruct the committee in looking at the whole impaired driving, drunk driving, “over 80”, drug-impaired driving package just because we didn't cover something in particular in this bill, although we seem to have covered quite a bit in the bill.
If there were other wording—This particular amendment refers to the comprehensive review of what we legislated in this act, whereas the whole drunk driving, drug-impaired driving piece is bigger than just this act. If we're going to look at it, we might as well look at the whole policy window rather than just this act. We may unnecessarily constrain the committee that's looking at it. I wouldn't want to tie their hands.
How would it be if I were to propose a friendly amendment that would refer to this act and its associated provisions in the Criminal Code?