Just for clarification, Mr. Ménard says this is consequential to clause 2. But clause 2 was defeated. Is this consequential to the fact that clause 2 is no longer part of Bill C-32?
On June 19th, 2007. See this statement in context.
On June 19th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Liberal
Marlene Jennings Liberal Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, QC
Just for clarification, Mr. Ménard says this is consequential to clause 2. But clause 2 was defeated. Is this consequential to the fact that clause 2 is no longer part of Bill C-32?
See context to find out what was said next.