I have two questions.
First of all, I congratulate Mr. Bagnell because we should increasingly get into the habit of reviewing legislation—we did so for reproductive technologies. Mr. Chair, you are aware that your government has appointed extremely conservative people to the new Assisted Human Reproduction Agency of Canada, but clearly that is a debate for another day.
My question is as follows: are we studying the act only or the act and the regulations? The regulations are quite important, especially for training. When I was health critic, we studied the act and the regulations on tobacco, for example. In some pieces of legislation, the regulations are just as important as the act. I wonder if this committee would accept an amendment to this clause so that it refers to the act and the associated regulations. We could discuss it. Is it desirable to look at the regulations as well? On two or three occasions, we have referred to the regulations, particularly for the reproductive technologies and training. I put that before the committee for consideration, and before the mover, of course.