Firstly, the statutory language is “annual report.” It should be an absolute requirement that an annual report be tabled by a specified date, or in its absence there should be some good justification for failing to meet that date. Accountability requires at least that—compliance with statutory language of an annual report.
Secondly, I suggested the type of information that might be mandated by statute. As I read the reports, the language in some of them really provides no basis for this group, or any other group, to know what the police did and why they did it. You have to refer back to the statutory language and the balance that is required by the statutory language.
Was this justified in the circumstances, having regard to what the police were doing? It's impossible to know from the language that is being used in the reports. There should be more concrete and more detailed language required. That's at the very least.