I just want to make a quick comment on Mr. Bagnell's case.
I know the case you're talking about from the Yukon, with the dogs that were stacked up. When the RCMP arrived, they were about to confiscate the animals and the individual who had killed them beforehand. Because of the loopholes in the legislation that exist right now, they could not press any charges against that individual. So it would have been nice to have a situation in which this individual could no longer have animals or would have been fined, but the fact is that they couldn't get any conviction. So nothing would have changed under Bill S-203. It would have been exactly the same outcome as it is now.