Evidence of meeting #12 for Justice and Human Rights in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was cases.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Tony Cannavino  President, Canadian Police Association
Robyn Robertson  Chief Executive Officer, Traffic Injury Research Foundation
Louise Nadeau  Full Professor, Research Group on the Social Aspects of Health and Prevention (GRASP), Université de Montréal
David Griffin  Executive Officer, Canadian Police Association

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

A funding issue.

5:10 p.m.

Chief Executive Officer, Traffic Injury Research Foundation

Robyn Robertson

Yes. I know it's something that Transport would like to do, and I know it's something that some people from Justice are interested in doing.

As I said, I think the information we got from the lawyers survey is very valuable in telling us how well we're doing and where some of the gaps are. In the U.S., where we surveyed police, prosecutors, judges, and probation, we figured out that most of their problems are very similar. There's a lot of consensus on solutions, and we've been able to leverage that consensus across professional groups to get some meaningful changes made.

It's easier to bring people together with their similarities than their differences.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

This is Transport Canada you're talking about?

5:10 p.m.

Chief Executive Officer, Traffic Injury Research Foundation

Robyn Robertson

Yes. They funded the survey.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

So Transport Canada funds surveys in American states with American—

5:10 p.m.

Chief Executive Officer, Traffic Injury Research Foundation

Robyn Robertson

No. Actually, Anheuser-Busch funded our research in the United States.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

I see. It would be good to see a Canadian survey once in a while.

The other point you brought up in your executive summary is the difference between the conviction rate in Quebec, at 41%, and in the Maritimes, at 75%. What is this vast difference in conviction rates due to?

5:10 p.m.

Chief Executive Officer, Traffic Injury Research Foundation

Robyn Robertson

It's the smaller caseloads out in the Atlantic provinces. They'd do about 100 cases versus the 150 cases they'd do in Quebec. And almost 90% of all of their impaired driving cases are 0.120% and up, so they're doing the very high-BAC offenders, and they tend to plea more cases.

The police also tend to be doing an excellent job out in the Atlantic regions. We find that there seems to be a better rapport between crown and police working together. If you look at arrest issues, screening device issues, and those sorts of pre-prosecution and arrest-type issues, they seem to be smaller in the Atlantic region than they are in some other jurisdictions.

So I think there are a couple of things going on, but--

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

In effect the blood alcohol content is 0.12%.

5:10 p.m.

Chief Executive Officer, Traffic Injury Research Foundation

Robyn Robertson

Yes. That's why they're doing so well with the conviction rate.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

Interesting.

Is the accident rate lower?

5:10 p.m.

Chief Executive Officer, Traffic Injury Research Foundation

Robyn Robertson

Out in the Maritimes? I would have to go and look at that. It wasn't something we looked at as part of the survey, although it is data that we do collect.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

It's rather interesting to see such a difference in the blood alcohol content enforcement level. It's maybe very difficult to compare.

5:10 p.m.

Chief Executive Officer, Traffic Injury Research Foundation

Robyn Robertson

I would think, too, it's not necessarily the police who aren't enforcing it. What you're seeing for some crown offices is that if you bring in a 0.08%, they won't touch it.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

If you bring in a 0.1% they won't touch it.

5:10 p.m.

Chief Executive Officer, Traffic Injury Research Foundation

Robyn Robertson

They're like, “Bring me 0.1% or higher.”

So it's a function as much as crown policies...and that's what we found in the survey of lawyers. There seems to be a lot of differentiation between what the actual practices are, what cases will be pled, versus what cases go to trial, what the BAC levels are. Those differences and practices also account for some of the differences in conviction rate.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

But that's not to say that they're laying less charges; it's just the conviction rate for those that do go to trial.

5:10 p.m.

Chief Executive Officer, Traffic Injury Research Foundation

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

Are there any other questions?

Monsieur Petit.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Daniel Petit Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC

I'm going to go back to the question I asked you earlier. Let's suppose a person is convicted for his involvement in a fatal car accident and that his blood alcohol level is 0.08%. In my practice, I've often seen fatal accident cases in which it was a first offence for the person involved. That person could serve his sentence in the community. You see what I mean.

We're permissive with those entering the penitentiary system. This system in Canada is like a big Swiss cheese, full of holes. There are a host of options for getting off, for never going to prison. Someone said earlier that we have to be able to put pressure on people before they are imprisoned or charged. Wouldn't there be some way of sending a message? You talked about fines and imprisonment. That's unfortunate, but we don't imprison these people in Quebec: we let them go.

5:15 p.m.

President, Canadian Police Association

Tony Cannavino

In short, these are deterrents designed to prevent incidents from occurring.

In some cases, people know very well that they won't be charged if their blood alcohol levels are less than 0.10%. There are also cases in which a person involved in an accident leaves the scene of that accident, goes home and has a few drinks, then calls the police station. That persons gets off; he can't be charged. That's another problem. If there was an automatic charge—if someone refuses to take the breathalyzer, he's charged with refusing to do so, but, when someone leaves the scene of an accident, goes home, calls the police station and says he had a drink at home, he's charged with nothing. Even if you charge him with leaving the scene of an accident, he'll cite all possible reasons, such as that he was under great stress, and will get off.

Currently, there are loopholes; that's for sure. However, if it is clear to a person that he's going to be sentenced, will have to use an ignition interlock with a breathalyzer and may have his licence suspended, he'll think twice about it, especially if he has a job. With regard to prevention as well, we've discussed at length the importance of clearly indicating the consequences people who are impaired will have to face if they are in an accident or are stopped. Fear of being stopped may at times be the beginning of wisdom.

I think there are things I didn't do when I was young because I was afraid my father would catch me. Someone who is afraid of being stopped on the road may automatically designate a driver for the evening, as I see my daughters and a number of other people do. Every time they go to a discotheque, they designate a driver, who doesn't drink for the evening. Everyone takes turn; they play that role.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

Madame Nadeau.

5:15 p.m.

Full Professor, Research Group on the Social Aspects of Health and Prevention (GRASP), Université de Montréal

Louise Nadeau

In the case of the 2,700 persons who die on Canada's roads every year, we're not talking about people who have been convicted or incarcerated. This is another type of driver. Our work is to find deterrents. The most important thing is that Canadians believe, when they take to the road, that the possibility that they will be stopped is entirely real. You must rely on that belief. Unfortunately, sentences of 25 years or life do not have that deterrent effect. The experiment was conducted in Massachusetts, and it was very well documented. The important thing is that the risk of being stopped, either by detectors or roadblocks, is utterly real for people. That's what works. Harsher punishment is reassuring, but it isn't effective.

5:15 p.m.

An hon. member

That means more police officers.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

Thank you, Mr. Petit and Ms. Nadeau.

Mr. Christopherson.