In order to make the best possible use of our time, and if it is the will of the committee, we could apply a single vote to the three other amendments and the consequential amendments. I think you would get a consensus to proceed in this fashion. If it is the will of the committee, and if you allow me to explain my three separate amendments, we could apply a single vote to all of the remaining Bloc Québécois amendments, which would allow us to deal with all of the amendments the Bloc has on the table. When the time comes, I will ask for a recorded vote. In the interest of moving ahead with our agenda, I do not think that there would be any point in considering each one individually.
With your agreement, we could consider the amendment with the reference number ending in 17, the one with the reference number ending in 26, and the one with the reference number ending in 40. Mr. Chairman, the amendment with the reference number ending in 17 extends the concept of cruelty to animals to stray animals. The amendment with the reference number ending in 26 extends the ban on animal ownership for recidivists to a lifelong ban. As I am sure you recall, witnesses argued that the current ban was not long enough. My last amendment, with the reference number ending in 40, amends the criteria for negligence to reflect the testimony we heard. Negligent behaviour is defined as that which is a marked departure from the behaviour an individual would normally adopt in the same circumstances.
If it is the will of the committee, I would be happy for us to vote on all of the Bloc amendments—the three main amendments and the consequential amendments—in one go in order to get them off the table.