Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Langille, I noticed that you stumbled and said “abstract”. A forensic person saying “abstract” must be like a Liberal saying good things about a Conservative budget.
I want to ask you a couple of questions about your very informative suggestions. We're here from the federal side, and I think everybody should know that we're here as guardians of the Criminal Code, the old beast that it is. Your suggestion about including 80 is something we can do; I think it's clearly something we can do. The issue of using a definition of breath alcohol instead of blood alcohol is also something we can do.
When we get into the provincial regimes and the issue of 0.05 per hundred leading to suspensions and detection, and all those things, it's not as easy for us. Obviously, we can make recommendations—but I do want to stick to what we can do.
In light of what Mr. Quaye said about interlocking devices, do I understand correctly that your committee would have anything to do with approving interlocking devices?