That's a very good point, Monsieur Lemay, and I'd want to be clear about that. The individual who would take on that responsibility would complete that responsibility. They wouldn't say, “I'm only doing this for four months of the year and therefore you're out of luck”. I think that's actually part of our problem with the resources we have available. Some judges or some individuals can't commit that kind of time.
This is precisely meant to address that. If, let's say, in a province there was one allocation of the one of the six, it would allow the chief justice, for instance, in the example given by the Department of Justice, to appoint three individuals who could sit. Once that individual is seized with the issue, they're seized with that case and they would complete that case. What we're saying is, in the regime we are putting in place we're not having one individual who will sit forever and just deal with specific claims. We're having superior court judges who, when they're seized with it, they're seized with it, but nonetheless they can then go back at some point. And as you quite correctly point out, just like trials today, they can take one day or they can take one year, but the person has to complete that.