It is really to address two matters. One of them is the tribunal. For instance, if I take the example of New Brunswick—it doesn't matter which province—let's say the province was getting one extra judge to accommodate the specific claims tribunal. We would expect the chief justice would then make recommendations to have three superior court judges available. It's not just one person on a permanent basis; you would have three. We would have that in whichever province or territory.
We are asking for a designation of more than that because the individual may not be available. It sounds a little confusing with the 20. There are six places for the claims tribunal. The other 14 are superior court judges, who we are appointing. It has nothing to do with the six, except that in a province, for instance, you might get two judges. You might get one to assist on the trials. You have the resources, but those resources we expect would be spread among three. It's three to one. That's where you get the 18.