Mr. Ménard, I think there is something abusive in making a claim, like my friend the parliamentary secretary just did, that if your bill were to be adopted, it would compromise the smooth running of certain investigations that are important from a national security standpoint, and, I would like once and for all, to go over this with you. I would like you to explain that that would not be possible, upon even a superficial reading your bill, because of the balance that the judge must take into account. I would like you to give us guarantees that it was not at all your intention to hamper investigations involving national security.
On March 5th, 2008. See this statement in context.