Do I have a little bit of time?
Yes, that example you mentioned, NAMBLA, I think that was raised yesterday also. I don't think that's where anyone around this table wants to go, but certainly we don't want to have a piece of legislation that could be interpreted in that way. My fear as well is that this is overly broad as currently written.
Could you comment a bit...and I'll leave this open to Mr. Bourque also. There has been a recent case on this dealing with the National Post. Many are commenting that there is a balance that we've achieved and it's the right balance.
Mr. Pecknold, Ms. Strachan, or Mr. Bourque, would you comment a bit on the fact that there is a law in place now and how perhaps this would change things? Because there is a test that can take place right now, there is a balance to protect journalistic sources even now. So could you comment on the balance that we've managed to achieve to this point?