Evidence of meeting #21 for Justice and Human Rights in the 39th Parliament, 2nd session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was point.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Art Hanger
I'd like to call the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights to order, this being Tuesday, April 1, 2008.
The orders of the day are before the committee: the order of reference of Wednesday, January 30, 2008, for study of Bill C-27, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (identity theft and related misconduct).
On a point of order, I'll hear Mr. LeBlanc.
Liberal
Dominic LeBlanc Liberal Beauséjour, NB
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I hope this doesn't take much time at all.
Mr. Chair, you will remember that at previous meetings of this committee we have sought to have a vote taken on a ruling of yours with which we disagree, on a matter unrelated to this particular hearing today. We're very conscious that we have witnesses, some of whom have travelled a considerable distance. We're anxious to hear their testimony on what we think is an important piece of legislation.
Mr. Chairman, I would ask that you immediately dispose of an undisposed-of matter, that being the challenge to your ruling that was made by my colleague Mr. Ménard, in which case we would be then prepared to immediately proceed to hear witnesses.
I would remind you, Mr. Chair, that in no way are we seeking to disrupt the regular business of this committee. That's why in the motion I presented, which you ruled out of order, we were suggesting additional hearings, in other words supplementary meetings.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Art Hanger
I did indeed, Mr. LeBlanc. You cannot move a motion on a point of order, I should point out.
Liberal
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Art Hanger
Yes. Well, on that basis, I'm sure the committee members, including you, Mr. LeBlanc, are very much aware of the Speaker's comments in reference to disrupting the committees by putting matters forward that are not of the mandate of the committee. This is the same thing you're attempting to do here today.
I'm sorry, I have ruled on that motion as being out of order. In this particular case, because there happens to be a majority role, including all the opposition members who insist on bringing this motion forward, the Speaker has made comment in reference to that. If you want, I can go over his comments.
He speaks of, first of all, the mandate of the committees, the responsibility to maintain that mandate. Secondly, when it comes to the issue of the sheer force of numbers in dealing with matters that come before committees, the procedures and the purposes of the committee should not be overruled or overrun by the majority, and that is the case right here.
As far as your motion is concerned, Mr. LeBlanc, it is a point of order, and you cannot move a motion on a point of order.
Bloc
Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC
Mr. Chairman, I know that you are a man of honour and that you believe in this institution. You know full well that all of the members here have tried very hard to ensure that this committee works well. When I challenged your ruling and called for a vote, you left the Chair, in a move that you have yet to explain. If you look to the clerk, you will see that the Standing Orders state that this is not debatable; you must immediately call the question on a ruling that has been challenged. In the interests of ensuring that the committee runs smoothly, I would ask that you respect this rule.
You know full well, Mr. Chairman, that the steering committee discussed the fact that the House has given us an important mandate. Our colleague, Mr. LeBlanc, wanted us to meet on Wednesday. He had the support of the Bloc Québécois. You cannot rewrite the Standing Orders.
This is the third time that this has happened in a committee under conservative chairmanship. Your colleagues did the same at House Affairs and in the Standing Committee on Official Languages. You did not want to abide by the Standing Orders because you knew that you would have had to have a vote. Instead, you chose to leave the Chair and paralyze the committee. The time will come when you will have to explain yourself.
I want you to take a recorded vote immediately. I am calling for a recorded vote on your decision to rule out of order... You had your rationale for doing so, I appreciate that, but the Standing Orders provide that I am entitled to challenge your decision. You can check with the clerk, it is not debatable. All of the experienced members on this committee know that it happens automatically. Perhaps the clerk would nod to show that I am right. You have to call the question straight away on a ruling that has been challenged.
I want a recorded vote. It is in the Standing Orders.
Conservative
Rob Moore Conservative Fundy Royal, NB
On Mr. LeBlanc's point, we have witnesses who have come from away, and this is exactly in line with what I heard the Speaker say in his ruling, when he talked about disruption of committee, when he talked about the majority or minority on a committee trying to distract from what is our duty.
Our duty before us today is to study a piece of legislation, Bill C-27. We have witnesses who have travelled to bring testimony on Bill C-27. It would be a shame if we didn't first allow for witness testimony. The opposition inevitably knows where this type of challenge is going.
Conservative
Rob Moore Conservative Fundy Royal, NB
You have made a ruling, Chair. I think your ruling is supported by what the Speaker said. The Speaker was very clear, if anyone cared to listen to him, before we left on break. He was very clear about this type of activity. The message I certainly took from his message to us as parliamentarians was to get on with the work and the business of committee and to not try to upset and disrupt what should be a process that honours the powers that have been vested in us by our constituents and by the people who put us here.
We have a responsibility to deal with legislation. We have legislation before the committee that the House has put before the committee. We have witnesses who are here to speak to that proposed legislation. Let's get on with hearing from the witnesses.
NDP
Penny Priddy NDP Surrey North, BC
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have a very small point. I thought I heard you say earlier, and you can correct me if I am wrong, that all of the opposition brought forward the motion. I do not believe that is correct. I don't think the NDP did, and I just wanted that to stand corrected, please.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Art Hanger
That was my mistake. The NDP did not participate in that. You are absolutely right.
Bloc
Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC
Mr. Chairman, could you please give your ruling on the point of order?
Bloc
Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC
Am I correct, yes or no, in thinking that the question has to be called immediately?
Conservative
Bloc
Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC
You have to give us your ruling on the point of order. We are all ears.
