Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you to the witnesses for being here.
I want to pursue the same issue, but I won't be as subtle as Mr. Ménard, who rarely is.
On the setting up the Mulroney-Schreiber inquiry, I guess I was under the same misapprehension that it would have been the Director of Public Prosecutions who normally would be giving advice as to the mandate of that inquiry. I understand from your evidence that this is not the case.
Mr. Saunders, as you are from that department, who in the department would normally have given advice to the minister as to the mandate of a public inquiry of that nature?