I think absolutely that there would have to be pretty solid evidence that there was an intent to produce, and that's why the word “intended” is included in the proposed amendment. Without intent and without being able to prove the intent, I don't think anybody should have any fear of either owning or selling individual items through the grocery store. As all of us know around this table, we wouldn't want to be unable to access the ingredients in crystal meth, because they all serve their useful purpose other than the production of crystal meth. We want to ensure that people, if they're going to be charged with this, have a clear intent to produce or traffic or sell this product.
The whole notion is that you'd have a combined number of things that would be included. I imagine you would have to have equipment and the different precursors in order to prove intent, or some type of past history of producing it.