More than crack cocaine, yes.
All right. There may be some investigation still that we could do there. The drug is already illegal. I was just seeking clarification about just how addictive it is relative to the other drugs that are a scourge for all of us.
In the bill itself you use the words “intended for use” in both paragraphs of the proposed new section. Are you able to say now who it is you are thinking about when you talk about intention? Is it some person in the chain of ownership or manufacture? Is it the end user? To use Mr. Petit's analogy, if I make a screwdriver, it's intended for many uses. If it ends up in the hands of a burglar, it might be a problem.
I'm having difficulty nailing down precisely what you mean when you say that something is “intended for use” in production. Who has to have that intention?