I have another question for you. It's on the new methodology for the study of statistics, in which you're proposing it be done every year rather than every five years. I know that my colleague, Mr. Comartin, is quoted as having expressed some concerns.
I asked you this privately, but I'm going to ask you on the record. We would get Statistics Canada to come here and talk about this to perhaps educate us better, but my concern would be with defining who the victim is in the situation. For instance, when you do tort law, there is an argument for the “thin-skull” victim. I may be a weak individual, and if some ten-places-removed relative is hurt in a crime, I may feel victimized. I want to know what you mean by victim. Is it by just your feeling that you're a victim or by your being an actual victim that we would do the study?