I don't want to belabour this or have a big debate on it. I do want to make the point, though, that we have a very significant number of bills we're either dealing with or are coming down the pipe. We have passed through the committee the bill dealing with gang activity. We have the one that was introduced here today on drug crime. We have one on auto theft, and there are others, credit for time served, for example.
We're all busy. I assume we're all busy. I know most of us around this table are. To take three days to have hearings on this very specific issue, we could do that.... I think it sets a precedent that anytime someone thinks we want to study some narrow issue, we should take additional days. And there are days that I don't, frankly, think most of us have the time to do. These types of questions can be put to experts who appear when we have committee meetings. We have regular committee meetings on all of these bills. Many of these bills touch on aspects of organized crime, including the one that we just passed through committee. So I think it's appropriate to put these types of questions to experts who appear on our bills every week. But to take three days to study this, I don't support that. We have a lot of bills we're dealing with and we only have so much time to do it in.
That's why I'm not supporting this motion.