That is a very useful answer. I understand that clearly, but what would you say to the argument... You talked about street gangs, for example. We have heard that there are 900 organizations that may be criminal groups. I have the impression that in terms of sophistication, structure and established membership, it varies widely between a Hells Angels chapter and a street gang made up of a group of young people who engage in criminal conduct.
Mr. Bartlett spoke a bit about this in his testimony. If we agree to allow the Hells Angels to be put on a list or named as a criminal organization, I have the impression that this is easier to explain than in the case of a little street gang made up of a band of young people who don't have enough to do after school.
Where do you draw the line between a group that is recognized as being extremely violent and having well established criminal objectives, biker gangs being among the most visible of them, and little groups of young people at the bottom of the ladder, who are in practical terms criminal organizations? Governments or prosecutors will not have a list of all the groups that form in every school. How will you distinguish between them?