That's relevant to determining whether or not somebody has participated in an activity of the criminal organization. You're still going to have to show that the criminal organization exists. These were evidentiary provisions that we hoped would relieve the burden somewhat in showing that the person before the court had participated in activities of that organization that were designed to enhance the organization's capacity.
I can't say there has been a lot of experience with these being used and tested in the courts and the courts reacting to them. Certainly this kind of evidence is frequently adduced, but it hasn't been presented in such a way as to show that adding to this list would materially help with the prosecutorial burden.