I wanted to ask Mr. Comartin a question about his amendment, if I could.
Steer me clear, as you have now for three and a half years, if I'm wrong, but I think the effect of the amendment is to take the one-day discretion--there's no discretion, it's one for one--in proposed subsection (3) and give the judge a discretion up to 1.5. The judge still may order one. I'm curious as to what it does to proposed subsection (3.1), which by your amendment would stay. It was that escape valve in the legislation to go to one and a half days, as it says, in circumstances; let's put it that way.
To use your logic, why didn't you go to a higher number of days in proposed subsection (3.1)?