Not really. That is one of the problems. The jurisprudence points to three factors that justify some enhancement of the time spent. One is this one that you bring up, which is going to apply universally to all these offenders now, and that is that there is this loss of remission in the case of provincially sentenced offenders and loss of parole in the case of federally sentenced offenders who have been on remand. That is the one reason; the other relates to conditions, and the other relates to a lack of programming, and so on. Some of the conditions are pretty harsh.
So I don't dispute the evidence you heard the other day.