The direction we had from our minister and from the government generally was to prepare a bill based on one to one, with an opportunity to go up to 1.5 if the circumstances justified it. Frankly, its impact will be that courts trying to do justice will find that in many cases the circumstances do justify something between one to one and 1.5 to one, but we'll have to see how that plays out.
Were you to adopt Mr. Comartin's suggestion and change the starting point to 1.5 to one, it's pure speculation on my part, but it might end up being the actual credit granted. At least courts would know that the parole remission issue was dealt with. That can actually be dealt with arithmetically. I think Dr. Doob suggested a different figure, but sometimes courts will give 1.3 to one where their only concern is lack of parole. So 1.33 to one would be the more accurate number arithmetically.
I think judges will try to the right thing. Another possibility is that they will lower the sentence they would have given in order to somehow take into account any unfairness.