I don't think the fact that they're bilingual is going to be held against them. I said at the beginning that it's desirable. I would agree that it would be the perfect world; if you can get a talented judge who is also conversant with the language, that's the best of both worlds.
What we have to do is come down to the tough decision, the ultimate decision--and it may not happen--in which you have a most competent judge who doesn't meet the requirements of the present amendment versus a judge who, though not as competent, does meet those requirements. If you get to that hypothetical position, then I say that in the interests of justice for the whole country, you should pick the most competent judge. After all, it's a judge you're looking for. I agree that chances are you'll be able to find both, but I don't think it should be a statutory requirement because of that possibility of not getting the most competent.