Very briefly, yes, indeed there was a decision in the Société des Acadiens case. That decision still stands on the interpretation of the law. What has changed since then is the manner of interpretation that the court applies.
The court has interpreted the importance of language, and it has expressed a different view. In Beaulac, for example, where language played a major part, it has recognized the importance of that in that context. In a criminal case, I think if the Société des Acadiens case were to be heard again, there is a possibility that with the evolution of jurisprudence today, the court would reach a different result from the one it reached back then.