I think they are reasonable.
They expanded the identification of a PIN, a personal identification number. They put in different wording, “personal authentication information”. I think that's an improvement because the PINs might change, the technology might change. We've captured that in answer to Mr. Murphy. We also talked about the use of a “similar” government document, and that wording was added. I thought these were improvements.
In addition, the other major amendment made was that they wanted to review the act after five years, a review that could focus on other technological changes that we might see. That could be very helpful as well.
So, yes, I think these are reasonable. Again, I'd like to see this committee and the House pass this as quickly as possible.