I guess in terms of the proceeds that would be generated from that fraud, there are provisions under proceeds of crime to attempt to seize and eventually forfeit those gains as proceeds of a criminal activity. They can be forfeited, obviously, to the crown. I'm not able to speak to what discretion a judge would have in terms of applying that in terms of restitution to victims.
Even if a fraud is committed by an individual in an organization, if those proceeds have been passed on to other individuals and through our investigation we can trace those proceeds, even if those proceeds have gone through two or three hands, which we call a laundering process, if we can still show the original source of those funds or proceeds from the criminal activity, we can attempt to have them forfeited as proceeds of crime, as proceeds of criminal activity.