Yes, that is the protection we are looking for.
Again, our position is that we would prefer to have the exemption in this section rather than in section 25.1, for the same reasons as I mentioned earlier. The use of identification by undercover police officers is a tool they use on a daily ongoing basis; it's not a one-time tool such as pursuing a one-time criminal activity, for which we would seek justification under section 25.1. It's a tool they need. As I said earlier, the whole foundation of an undercover program is being able to use undercover identification. Because it is a daily tool that they require and use, we're looking to support it in its current fashion.