Of course, one is that the CBA's position is very clear that it shouldn't be changed. That's still our position.
To answer your question in terms of the paperwork, from my personal perspective and experience I can tell you that whether it's more paperwork or not, the rule of law is very important. When you're making exceptions to the rule of law, quite frankly, more paperwork and those protections and safeguards in section 25 are essential. It may slow things down, but at the same time, you have to balance out why you're slowing it down. You're slowing it down because it's an exception. When you're dealing with exceptions you have to take exceptional measures. From my experience, an analogy, Mr. Comartin, is that part VIs and wiretaps are very lengthy. I've had the opportunity to deal with part VIs. But they're lengthy for a reason, because of what you're dealing with and the balancing of rights. That's why the CBA position is quite clear that this exemption is not needed; the law shouldn't change.