I agree. As in all things, nothing is perfect. Therefore, there may be times where indeed a unilingual judge would shed some very relevant light on a debate before the Supreme Court of Canada. On the other hand, in other situations, the unilingual judge would in fact distort the debate because he did not properly understand the arguments. And so, unfortunately, we have these two situations.
What should we do? I think we must consider what it is we are trying to correct here. We are trying to ensure that the person before the court, represented by their lawyer, will be understood by the tribunal.