I get to decide what I do, at least as a parliamentarian, Mr. Steyn.
With regards to the principle of a legislated body, short of criminal legislation, whether it be in the Human Rights Commission or in some other legislation, you're both totally opposed to that. You're satisfied to leave the hate crime within the hate propaganda section of the code, but nothing further than that. Is that the position of both of you?
I don't want to lay too much of a trap here. Let me throw this at you: the German situation. Germany has passed legislation that actually makes it a crime. Let's say we don't go that far. As a country we're going to say that it is hate literature, hate propaganda, hate speech if you deny the Holocaust, just because that is damaging to the Jewish community per se. Let me say we're going to do that for the Holocaust and we may do it for some of the other well-known genocides, be it Rwanda and the more recent ones, or go back to the Armenian-Turkish one, those kinds. We may pass a law to say that is hate speech and you're not allowed to say that in this country.
Would you be willing to support that kind of legislation?