I was not wrong in thinking that they did not have the authority to declare a provision unconstitutional. I was going to ask you what the Attorney General's position was on this. After all, when you want to have a provision of law declared unconstitutional, you have to give notice to the Attorney General. And in this case, no notice was given to the Attorney General.
I would like to know what you want. Sometimes, I get the sense that you want section 13 abolished, but other times, you seem to be saying that the problem is not really section 13 but the fact that people at the commission acted in a manner you consider scandalous, illegal and so forth.
What other reasons do you have for abolishing section 13? Are you claiming that, if those people had acted in good faith and if the employees of the commission had not made all the mistakes you mentioned, section 13 should stay in the act?