So if I understand the explanation you've just given.... Let's say there's a police operation investigation that's ongoing. Sometimes they take several years. In the course of that lawful investigation you have one or more officers who are authorized and in fact ordered to go undercover. In order to maintain the secrecy of their identity, there are false documents prepared to provide them with an identity.
In the course of being undercover, they may commit illegal acts. There are already laws that have been made to protect them, such as proportionality, etc. If this amendment went through, that particular officer would have to get authority every single time. Is that what I'm to understand?