No. The minister did indicate that those procedural changes were regarded as constitutionally feasible. They are procedural. We're changing it for those who are still subject to the faint hope clause in some respect--that is, for crimes committed before the law changes.
There are three changes. One is that the test at the first threshold is raised from “reasonable prospect” to “substantial likelihood” of success. Second, they have a time limit within which to bring their application. It is 90 days around the particular date. If they're unsuccessful in having their application advanced, they would have to wait five years before the next opportunity to bring forward another application. Again, the test would be a substantial likelihood of success before a jury.