If I might, though, I would say that if you go along with that argument, then by raising it from 80 to 100, you'd feel better about it, because then it's higher, and it's more, so I think we have to be careful. I think the other witnesses mentioned that we're going to be told that some of the studies--we had two previous witnesses who are lawyers--indicated that in jurisdictions where there was a 0.05 there were significant reductions in motor vehicle accidents and fatalities, but then we're told, well, no, one's not criminal and the other is.
From a personal perspective, I guess, the argument is that it would be challenged more, so if it's going to be challenged more at 0.05, then as a lawmaker I'm asking, is it going to be challenged less if we raise the offence? Succinctly put--a short answer--would I be right?